Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (4)Inflammasome and immune disorders (2)Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications (2)Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies (1)Vasculitis and related conditions (1)
Batu ED, Sener S, Rodrigues M, Vinit C, Hofer F, et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) •
CS are used to abort disease flares in periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome. We aimed to obtain a global overview of physicians' CS usage strategies and analyse the data in the literature regarding CS use in PFAPA syndrome. The Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism Clinical Practice Strategies (JIR-CliPS) PFAPA questionnaire included nine questions on CS use in addition to the demographic data questions. The survey was distributed via e-mail to potential respondents. The MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus databases were searched systematically to extract the data regarding CS use in PFAPA syndrome. From 47 countries, 144 physicians (female/male = 2.6; 67.4% paediatric rheumatologists) answered the survey. Most respondents (n = 133; 92.4%) prescribe CS in PFAPA flares. The most frequently prescribed CS was prednisolone (63.2%). The definition of response to CS was indicated as 'response within 12 h' by the highest number of respondents (n = 61; 42.4%). When CS cause an increase in attack frequency, most (57.9%) consider another treatment if this causes a decrease in quality of life. Forty-four (30.6%) respondents were 'routinely' prescribing CS to PFAPA patients, and this practice was more frequent among more experienced physicians (P < 0.001). We identified 46 articles in the literature describing 4564 PFAPA patients treated with CS. Prednisone was the most frequently preferred CS (48.2%). Response to CS was around 95%, although an increase in attack frequency was noted in almost 35% of the patients. Physicians frequently use CS for PFAPA in their routine clinical practice. Regarding treatment modification, the quality of life was a prominent consideration for physicians.
Rollet-Cohen V, Mirete J, Dingulu G, Hofer F, Hofer M, et al.
Clinical rheumatology •
To determine vaccination coverage among a French cohort of children with recurrent autoinflammatory fever syndromes (RFS). All RFS children aged 2 to 19 years from the Juvenile Inflammatory Rheumatism cohort and followed at the French Reference Center for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Versailles Hospital, were included in our observational study. Immunisation status at ages 2, 7 and 15 years and at the last outpatient visit was evaluated according to the standard French vaccine schedule and recommended supplementary vaccines for patients with immunosuppressive therapy. Of 200 patients, 90 (45%) had periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenitis syndrome; 52 (26%) had familial Mediterranean fever and 50 (25%) had undefined recurrent fever. Complete immunisation as per the standard schedule was obtained by 32% of patients at 2 years, 28% at 7 years, 6% at 15 years and 44% at the last outpatient visit. Similar or higher coverage was obtained by the last outpatient visit for most vaccines, compared to immunisation coverage at 2 years: pneumococcus (91% vs 88%), diphtheria tetanus poliomyelitis (82% vs 86%), hepatitis B (79% vs 69%) and measles, mumps, rubella (91% vs 50%). No patients with immunosuppressive therapy (n = 14) were up to date for all supplementary immunisations recommended for them. Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially for infants who present with recurrent febrile episodes. The initial vaccination delay is partially corrected through specialist follow-up in later years. Coverage according to the supplementary vaccine recommendations for immunosuppressed patients is poor. Key Points • Vaccination coverage for RFS children is suboptimal, especially at 2 years of age which is likely due to the prevalence of early recurrent febrile symptoms. • The initial vaccination delay is partially recovered during later follow-up at an expert rheumatology center. • Specific recommendations are particularly difficult to apply to patients on immunosuppressive therapy.